Application to United States legislature (Representative and Senate) for performance of subordinate United States Constitution contractual duty
The below following letter was sent as a valid contract request by one of the making owners of the USC contract. This information is being openly posted so others will know how to evaluate the honor and duty of our hired hands when measured against the contract they created hired hands have asked to be our faithful servants in our household. I have not figured out (if it is even possible) to copy and use .pdf files to do posting. The below letter is filed as a public record in the El Pasco County, CO clerk’s office at number 208074828. You can get a record copy straight from that office, or contract me via email at sjcaruthers@yahoo.com and I will provide you a .pdf file of the recorded letter and receipt confirmation number.
RE: Application to United States legislature (Representative and Senate) for performance of subordinate United States Constitution contractual duty for their help in abolishing this nation of domestic Violence from created persons against me, Siegfried J Caruthers and others of the body politic.
To:
US House of Representative
% Clerk Lorraine C Miller or current clerk person
US Capital, Room H154
Washington, DC 20515-6601
and
US Senate
% of Office of Secretary of the Senate: Nancy Erickson or current person
232 Senate Hart Office Bldg.
Washington, DC 20510
and
See last page for those persons sent a copy without any attachments for notice of this letter information.
Date: June 15, 2008
House of Representative and Senate or congress:
I am known as Siegfried J Caruthers, one of many of the body politic, who is a making owner by birthright and knowing adoption of the Supreme Law of this land. That Law is known as the Declaration of Independence (DoI) of July 4, 1776. An earlier signed and openly filed copy of that DoI is attached to this letter.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. –
I am one of the making owners of the United States Constitution of America (USC), by birthright, adoption, public utterances, use, and open filing of signed subordinate law to the DoI. An earlier signed and openly filed copy is attached to this letter.
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
The intent of Union (face to face with no 3rd party between) with Our created congress is My purpose with and for this letter. I have dealt with before --1: your created head inferior administrative United States Supreme Court; 2: then made application to the President for assistance in protection against domestic Violence. Both persons ignored my application as no correction/help was forth coming. I then impeached the person of the President, and provided the Senate with notice and provided Myself as the self-appointed Chief Justice of the contractual supreme Court. The Senate has refused to do their contractual duty per the USC contract and clear the impeachment or let it stand that the person of Bush as President is not morally nor contractually qualified to hold the office. Congress is attempting to run this nation as a king type democracy via pretense of following and adhering to the DoI and the subordinate USC.
Three times or more congress has denied to me and taken from me by force my unalienable Rights from the Creator, failed to support my efforts to get the DoI and subordinate USC contract terms enforced. The same failure of congress applies to getting contract chartered entities and or persons removed from my nation for failure to follow or honor the DoI and subordinate USC contracts in freewill subordinate contracts dealings with me. These items must be in accordance with the DoI and subordinate USC contract congress pretends to follow. I am invoking my duty and issue this letter call for adherence to strict contract intent and terms.
Unless you meet the following contract intent and terms, congress has forfeited the contract right to exist. There are too many failures of congress to correctly and properly follow the contact terms for one owner to cover with this one letter. If congress makes this a start of returning to the intent of the DoI and subordinate USC, the making Owners and honorable persons will have more to change later.
Absolute corrections required as of this letter:
1. The signing making Owners of the DoI and the subordinate USC are the only People who can take any unalienable Rights from the Creator from any People or persons, and that by action by Jury of making Owners of a supreme Court using USC due process. Liberty is defined as no one above and that includes all created persons as NOT being over or above the making Owner or another off work duty person.
2. All persons will be directed to honor any persons’ request for a habeas corpus at the time the habeas corpus is given. Plus the due process of the USC contract requires any proper valid warrant for a non-consensual search of private property, person, things, or making owners shall only be issued by an active supreme Court grand jury. All inferior administrative courts who wish to issue warrants must clearly indentify on the paper of the warrant that the warrants are only valid for consensual and non-coerced use.
3. The charters of all entities who do not follow the intent of the contract rules, will die a civil death and the remaining USC charter entities will do no business with the former entities.
4. The serial numbered federal reserved note will be redeemable at any member bank with the various states within 90 days of the date of this letter. This is mandatory, otherwise the state inferior administrative court are prevented from any ruling concerning non-obtainable standard lawful money of account. ….. make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts,…… All consensual parties to such a hearing would have to agree that the USC contract was not being adhered to or used and these facts put on the hearing record and what the rules of the hearing were. In addition, it is the intent of the DoI and subordinate USC, that the state sets the salary for their congressman, collects and sends that money to the federal treasury. The federal treasury then pays the state set salary, with state sent and provided funds. This condition is expected to be in affect for any congress taking office in 2009. What making owner would let the created hired persons set their own salary? PS: Attached for notice is a letter minus attachments to Treasury Sec Paulson dated June 21, 2008 concerning redeemable or non-redeemable Federal Reserve treasury notes.
5. All congress persons starting with 2009, when they accept the job, will not be inhabitants of the state they serve…..( ….Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.) This means they are non-voters for their contract period of service to me.
6. For the person the electors choose for starting the office term of President in 2009, the vice-president will be the electors second place vote getter. Other wise, the person of the President is starting off by not following the USC contact. That would be doing or accepting a violation of the USC contract on the first day in office, an impeachable act. For 2009 starting term, I expected to be hired as the Chief Justice so all making owners and persons understand the valid contractual impeachment power is in place and has been acknowledged by congress and the new presidential person. .
7. Only the accepted version of the USC has been changed by the making owners. The created hired persons can not change the Body Politics’ governmental contacts. Only the first class making Owners can make changes to their creation.
The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same. In keeping with the intent of the USC contract that it required making Owners acceptance when changes were made, and contract interpretation maxim that only parties to a contract had standing to be a party to contract actions, the following actions have been performed. 1. The Ratification of the following making owners was done by convention of remote wireless communication for nine states, and is valid to ratify this accepted USC for this congress and nation. The making Owners and the states are as follow: 1. Justin Irvin—Wyoming; 2. Robert Intlekofer--- Iowa; 3. Mary Severance---Colorado; 4. Siegfried J Caruthers--- Tennessee; 5. Patrica Korsval & Lars Stephan---California; 6. John Paul Fagot---Missouri; 7. James Mozingo---Maryland; 8. Rita Critel---Nebraska; 9. Robert Cook---Alabama. We nine have accepted and signed on as making Owners of the DoI and the subordinate USC. We each have also provided a letter of this action to the US Secretary of State, to notify each of the states, the appropriate federal agencies, and affected treaty nations.
If any one burdens the unalienable Rights of any individual in those states that are not yet a signing partaker of the accepted contracts, any action not in accordance with the intent of the in force contract much be explained in clear simple English of what rules the moving party is using and their assumed jurisdiction. I do not consent to have my law besmirched with unlawfulness from others who wrongly blame my just DoI and subordinate USC contract law.
I expect the congress to convene within 10 days of receipt of this letter, and ensure the necessary action items are taken care of. If said convening and corrections are not complete with 10 to 15 days, then I will have to consider my next steps to get the contracts honored by another group of hired created persons. I would suggest a joint convening of the two houses of congress.
Siegfried J Caruthers: ________________________________________
Making owner, and a judicial power per the USC
Attachments:
signed Declaration of Independence – 5 pages
signed accepted subordinate United States Constitution – 15 pages
notice via signed letter to Sec Paulson of US Treasury – 2 pages date 6/21/08
Notice is given by this letter without any attachments to the following persons/US Departments:
Person of Sec. Paulson or current; US Treasury Department; 1500 Pennsylvania Ave, NW; Washington, DC 20220
Person of AG, Michael Mukasey or current; Department of Justice; 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW; Washington, DC 20530-0001
Person of Sec. Rice or current; Department of State; 2201 C Street NW; Washington, DC 20520
Sunday, July 20, 2008
unalienable rights & USC required contract money
State of standard lawful money from Paulson (head of US Treasury)
I do not know how most of you folks read and understand the law of this nation. Just as I do not try to convince flat earth believer that the earth is really another shape I will not try to spoon feed anyone my view of contract law. Does it matter whether the flat earth believers are correct or I am? This is the first of two done actions that I consider valid orders from my status with respect to the contract laws of this nation. If this works for posting, it will be followed by a second posting. I do hope the readers of this posting, enjoy becoming making owners, hence drivers of the contract law.
Please note: there is a blank space before the .pdf file of the publicly recorded letter concerning money kicks in. As far as I know, this allows my actions to be used by others as supporting their position concerning funny money and the contract requirements for this land.
I could not get the .pdf file to post, the following below letter and USPS confirmation of receipt is filed in El Pasco County, CO. at number 2080744829. If you wish to use, you can get from the CO county court clerk, or request via email from me and I will email the .pdf recorded file.
I can be contacted at for work files and my view point at <sjcaruthers@yahoo.com>
Serial Numbered US Federal Reserve Notes per Treasury
Date: June 21, 2008
To:
Person of Henry M. Paulson, Jr. or current Sec.
Treasury Department
1500 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20220
From:
Siegfried J Caruthers
Currently at: 1500 Hillcrest Rd, Apt 613
Mobile, AL 36695
RE: MY Request the enclosed 3 Serial Numbered 20’s I own and hold be exchanged for US minted gold coins.
Sir:
Long ago, I took some of the same type serial numbered notes to a local state member bank of the Federal Reserve banking system, but they could not or would not give me minted coin for the serial numbered legal tender notes. The action was repeated with the same result at one of the 12 Federal Reserve banks.
My status is as follows: I claim to be a making owner and accepter of the Supreme Law of this land known as the Declaration of Independence (hereafter DoI) and the subordinate accepted (my me and others) United States Constitution (hereafter USC). As a making owner and by the DoI and USC contracts a judicial power of this lands supreme Court, I send this judicial request letter to you. You are further informed that I have impeached the Person of President Bush, and you have no valid president above you to block, order, or cover for any contractual duty or non-contractual actions you take with regard to my request. For your peace of mind, I tell you I have provided notice to the appropriate houses of my Congress, with notice of my impeachment and offer to be the trial Chief Justice of the supreme Court mandated by the USC. Congress has chosen to not clear his name and thus, again qualify Bush to be the person of President. Those being the conditions, you working directly as appointed by congress, owe me the contract duty I am requesting.
Find enclosed 3 Federal Reserve serial numbers notes: CG 11078472 A;
GF 64694046 B; and IC 76924108 A. I want these three notes redeemed for indicated face value of minted US coin (standard lawful dollars). Since I have not been able to do so, at a local member system bank, I require shipping to my temporary address of this letter.
If the ordered redeemable does not take place and delivery made within 10 days after receipt, then this request serves as open notice to the world that any Monopoly money notes are as good as these more fancy non-redeemable Federal Reserve notes. By USC contract the federal court system can not order the use of a person or persons worthless piece of paper standing above worthless paper selected, made, or used another person or persons.
My ordered request for an owed contract duty per the USC,
Siegfried J Caruthers: ______________________________________________
A Judicial power of the supreme Court per the USC contract terms
PS: This letter without enclosed Federal Reserve bank notes will be attached to an application to congress I am making per the USC terms.
a: Enclosed are the three above listed serial numbered Federal Reserve Bank notes
I do not know how most of you folks read and understand the law of this nation. Just as I do not try to convince flat earth believer that the earth is really another shape I will not try to spoon feed anyone my view of contract law. Does it matter whether the flat earth believers are correct or I am? This is the first of two done actions that I consider valid orders from my status with respect to the contract laws of this nation. If this works for posting, it will be followed by a second posting. I do hope the readers of this posting, enjoy becoming making owners, hence drivers of the contract law.
Please note: there is a blank space before the .pdf file of the publicly recorded letter concerning money kicks in. As far as I know, this allows my actions to be used by others as supporting their position concerning funny money and the contract requirements for this land.
I could not get the .pdf file to post, the following below letter and USPS confirmation of receipt is filed in El Pasco County, CO. at number 2080744829. If you wish to use, you can get from the CO county court clerk, or request via email from me and I will email the .pdf recorded file.
I can be contacted at for work files and my view point at <sjcaruthers@yahoo.com>
Serial Numbered US Federal Reserve Notes per Treasury
Date: June 21, 2008
To:
Person of Henry M. Paulson, Jr. or current Sec.
Treasury Department
1500 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20220
From:
Siegfried J Caruthers
Currently at: 1500 Hillcrest Rd, Apt 613
Mobile, AL 36695
RE: MY Request the enclosed 3 Serial Numbered 20’s I own and hold be exchanged for US minted gold coins.
Sir:
Long ago, I took some of the same type serial numbered notes to a local state member bank of the Federal Reserve banking system, but they could not or would not give me minted coin for the serial numbered legal tender notes. The action was repeated with the same result at one of the 12 Federal Reserve banks.
My status is as follows: I claim to be a making owner and accepter of the Supreme Law of this land known as the Declaration of Independence (hereafter DoI) and the subordinate accepted (my me and others) United States Constitution (hereafter USC). As a making owner and by the DoI and USC contracts a judicial power of this lands supreme Court, I send this judicial request letter to you. You are further informed that I have impeached the Person of President Bush, and you have no valid president above you to block, order, or cover for any contractual duty or non-contractual actions you take with regard to my request. For your peace of mind, I tell you I have provided notice to the appropriate houses of my Congress, with notice of my impeachment and offer to be the trial Chief Justice of the supreme Court mandated by the USC. Congress has chosen to not clear his name and thus, again qualify Bush to be the person of President. Those being the conditions, you working directly as appointed by congress, owe me the contract duty I am requesting.
Find enclosed 3 Federal Reserve serial numbers notes: CG 11078472 A;
GF 64694046 B; and IC 76924108 A. I want these three notes redeemed for indicated face value of minted US coin (standard lawful dollars). Since I have not been able to do so, at a local member system bank, I require shipping to my temporary address of this letter.
If the ordered redeemable does not take place and delivery made within 10 days after receipt, then this request serves as open notice to the world that any Monopoly money notes are as good as these more fancy non-redeemable Federal Reserve notes. By USC contract the federal court system can not order the use of a person or persons worthless piece of paper standing above worthless paper selected, made, or used another person or persons.
My ordered request for an owed contract duty per the USC,
Siegfried J Caruthers: ______________________________________________
A Judicial power of the supreme Court per the USC contract terms
PS: This letter without enclosed Federal Reserve bank notes will be attached to an application to congress I am making per the USC terms.
a: Enclosed are the three above listed serial numbered Federal Reserve Bank notes
Tuesday, July 1, 2008
unalienable rights vs donkey & elephant circus
Reply to Hope and the world at large:
Your question indicate you and I think differently about the law of this land and how it is suppose to be set up. To say I consider your questions way off point, and indicating a lack of understanding, at least from my view point, is a very mild way of saying --- one of us needs to do a lot more thinking on the law of this land.
I claim ownership of the Declaration of Independence (DoI) and also the subordinate accepted United States Constitution (USC) (as I accept-not as the world talks about). I have signed the contacts and filed as a matter of record and told various and assorted persons of my position/status. My status is -- a making owner of both the DoI and subordinate USC. I am a Citizen of the United States. Both the DoI and USC are contracts. By signing on as a making owner, I hold by contract status, the position of a created judicial power of the USC’s supreme Court. I am one among many and by claiming I have a part in/of the contracts, I have standing. What gives you standing?
That said: I now go the words of the USC:
“”[[Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
(The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two persons, of whom one at least shall not lie an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; a quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two-thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice-President.) The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.]]””
Read it and understand:: The contract is set up for us to choose electors who should then find a good man and vote for him. The contract implies strongly that once we choose electors, on a local scale, they then have the job of finding and voting for a presidential candidate. That means all this crap the from various parties and talk for popular vote or election of the president, is simply a Roman bread and circus show and is not according to the contract law of this land. Hope, you seem to have bought into this dog and pony show.
Please note the contract words are person and Native born. This part of the contract has nothing to with the birth of an individual via the birth canal or even by cesarean. I suspect it may take you a while to mull over the real intended time limit requirements, and qualifiers for this part of the contract language.
The governor of California Arnold S. can be president, and is contract suitable. For your info, remember Barry Goldwater. By using this Barack is not qualified because of where his mother’s legs were spread or womb was cut junk, then Barry Goldwater would not have been either. He was not birthed in the USA. It doesn’t matter that Arizona, later became a state. Go back and read the rules. There is no exception for being born in a soon to be state. Last for this posting -- natural born and native born are two very different words, especially when part of contract language.
Let’s elect the best electors we can vote for and let them do their job. I am tired of this donkey and elephant circus. I am out of it. It was much more enjoyable to watch Siegfried and Roy perform their show.
Your question indicate you and I think differently about the law of this land and how it is suppose to be set up. To say I consider your questions way off point, and indicating a lack of understanding, at least from my view point, is a very mild way of saying --- one of us needs to do a lot more thinking on the law of this land.
I claim ownership of the Declaration of Independence (DoI) and also the subordinate accepted United States Constitution (USC) (as I accept-not as the world talks about). I have signed the contacts and filed as a matter of record and told various and assorted persons of my position/status. My status is -- a making owner of both the DoI and subordinate USC. I am a Citizen of the United States. Both the DoI and USC are contracts. By signing on as a making owner, I hold by contract status, the position of a created judicial power of the USC’s supreme Court. I am one among many and by claiming I have a part in/of the contracts, I have standing. What gives you standing?
That said: I now go the words of the USC:
“”[[Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
(The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two persons, of whom one at least shall not lie an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; a quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two-thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice-President.) The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.]]””
Read it and understand:: The contract is set up for us to choose electors who should then find a good man and vote for him. The contract implies strongly that once we choose electors, on a local scale, they then have the job of finding and voting for a presidential candidate. That means all this crap the from various parties and talk for popular vote or election of the president, is simply a Roman bread and circus show and is not according to the contract law of this land. Hope, you seem to have bought into this dog and pony show.
Please note the contract words are person and Native born. This part of the contract has nothing to with the birth of an individual via the birth canal or even by cesarean. I suspect it may take you a while to mull over the real intended time limit requirements, and qualifiers for this part of the contract language.
The governor of California Arnold S. can be president, and is contract suitable. For your info, remember Barry Goldwater. By using this Barack is not qualified because of where his mother’s legs were spread or womb was cut junk, then Barry Goldwater would not have been either. He was not birthed in the USA. It doesn’t matter that Arizona, later became a state. Go back and read the rules. There is no exception for being born in a soon to be state. Last for this posting -- natural born and native born are two very different words, especially when part of contract language.
Let’s elect the best electors we can vote for and let them do their job. I am tired of this donkey and elephant circus. I am out of it. It was much more enjoyable to watch Siegfried and Roy perform their show.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
