DoI --the supeme law of the this land

Since this blog is concerning the law of this land, I think it is appropriate to very near the blogs operational start to make a few comments and then, post the supreme law in it's entirety.
The DoI is a covenant to us that claim the law, by being either very old or knowning adoption. I did by birthright and knowing adoption. As a square is to a general parallelogram, a covenant is to a contract. A contract with very defined contract conditions. You can be a Sovereign, accept and follow the DoI as your law and still deal with others as a Sovereign. Not so for the subordinate USC contract. Please note: many and most of the legal system use the word "inalienable" instead of the actual word "unalienable". The two word are not really the same. Since the DoI is a contract, the word "unalienable" means no burden can be laid on you if you don't want to pick up the burden of your own freewill. Many of the religious say their God gave them freewill, so does the supreme law of this land. Prevew of coming blog post. In the next blog posting, we will get to the subordinate USC contract and your status to use or deal with.

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.He has refuted his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these ColoniesFor taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred. to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. --And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
--John HancockNew Hampshire:Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew ThorntonMassachusetts:John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge GerryRhode Island:Stephen Hopkins, William ElleryConnecticut:Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver WolcottNew York:William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis MorrisNew Jersey:Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham ClarkPennsylvania:Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George RossDelaware:Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKeanMaryland:Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of CarrolltonVirginia:George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter BraxtonNorth Carolina:William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John PennSouth Carolina:Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur MiddletonGeorgia:Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

I/We the undersigned claim and declare this written law as the supreme law of this land. I/We uphold and adhere to the intent of the law.

answer to a high school student in 2002

First Chief Justice gave this response on 1/21/2002:

I will answer your question after a fashion. You asked the question, and should be told the truth as I know (or believe it). I am not sure your teacher will like this reply and I would suggest if you use any part of the answer you discuss it with one or both of your parents. I have had three daughters go through school, and I was able to tell them what I consider the truth and guide them into what answers the teachers were expecting. In your case, I am not sure of your level of training by parents, your personal understanding or exposure to the concepts this country is based on, nor how your teacher accepts things outside her line of thought. Most don't, my kids only had one teacher that did and he had thought on the way things should have been. Put simply, I am going to tell you what most people have never even thought of. The United States Constitution (USC) does not affect us in this country. It is not followed, and most folks do not have the first ideal of how to read or understand it-- the USC. People may pull bits and pieces out of the sentences and because the sentences make sense to them, use the concepts concerning personal freedoms. But their use of the USC is like folks telling storks bring babies--it just isn't true. I am now going to give you some information I used for several other questions. Parts of it will not apply, but maybe you can understand the basis from which to approach an understanding of this land's laws. --------------------------------------------I can’t answer your questions in a real fashion as you request, because the question is based on things that I know are wrong. Even the wording of this question, in a strict lawful sense could be misleading. A citizen (person) is a created position. Do you mean citizen or Sovereign and/or State (Sovereign with respect to his creation, the USC)? And with grievance against the hired help, do you mean civil or the government (hired help) has used force against one (an individual). As to the "Supreme Court", do you mean the inferior equity court created by the hired help and for reason of the lie, called the "united states supreme court"? It is not the supreme Court created by the Sovereigns via the USC.It was never meant to be a democracy. I will agree the law is not being followed. But the problem is not only the hired help, but also the People's understanding of the concept put forth. I have some questions for you. Would you hire me or someone else to work for you and be over you? Would you give me the right by that hiring contract to take money by force out of your pocket? Would you hire me to use hired guns against you? Or any force for that matter? Would you hire me to judge you? Would you hire me to change the contract you hired me to work for you by, without coming back to you to change the contract? Would you make a deal with others to do the above? Would you make a deal (compact) with others and then change it without getting them to agree by the procedure agreed to originally? I sure wouldn't, but then I don't know about you. The supreme law of this land is the Declaration of Independence, a compact between the Sovereigns and the USC is the subordinate compact to the Sovereigns (made by them) and contract to the hired help who agreed to follow the rules and especially the intent of the supreme law.It is your document and mine. You want me to tell you what it says? I will give you mostly what it means to me. I have read the united states code annotated, but do not think the us codes annotated (usca) say a whole lot about. But the hired help are not suppose to tell you, the master, what to do and what the rules for your own house say and mean.The Declaration of Independence (I hope you have read and though on it) is the supreme law of this land. It is listed in the usca as the organic law of land. Means it cannot be changed by hired help. The short form of the essence of the law is --We hold these truths to be self-evident (don't need explaining) that all men (individuals, and that includes women, children, blacks, gays, hispanics, etc) are created equal (with respect to this law), that they are endowed (given) by their Creator (allah, god, vishnu, the post on the corner) with certain unalienable (means a lien or burden cannot be laid on your shoulders, ie you can not be made to owe or be responsible for) Rights, that among these (not limited to just those listed)are Life, Liberty(no one over) and the pursuit of Happiness. Capital letters denote a proper subject and these items carry capitals in the body of the sentence. The very next sentence states that the only reason for forming a government is to secure these Rights. Means the whole purpose of USC was to make sure all the People were insured their unalienable Rights given them by Creator. You must also, read the complete document, but it goes on to list a very large number of things that were worth fighting about that the king of england was doing. Most are being done by hired help to the People they are suppose to serve today.Until we changed the practice of the world bodies, every nation was ruled by a king (sometime called something else) who ruled as a direct appointment of god. Since god could do no wrong, the king could or would not do wrong. So a disobedience of the king's law was a direct disobedience and affront to god.The first paragraph is to world, telling them why this thing is being done. The write up goes on to say, we had in the past accepted this rule of appointment by god nonesense, but it's just not so now. So since we had once accepted it, we are now telling the world many of the reasons why we are rejecting it and the doctrine. WE are Going With Creator and his Rule of equality. We are going to accept our full, equal, and rightful place as an equal with Creator. Some words you need to know, Congress--means a gathering--the People gathered at Bunker (Breeds actually) Hill, Valley Forge, York Town, Concord, and ratified (passed) this the only begotten Law of the People. Hope this helps.PS-- I have by self-appointment made myself Chief Justice of the USC's supreme Court. That is the only open supreme Court I am aware of. If you are aware of another besides the inferior equity court created by the hired congress and called for reasons of guile (the lie)"united states supreme court", I would love to know of it.
Yours for unalienable Rights from Creator.

Test

This is my first blog post before I actually say anything important.