answer to a high school student in 2002

First Chief Justice gave this response on 1/21/2002:

I will answer your question after a fashion. You asked the question, and should be told the truth as I know (or believe it). I am not sure your teacher will like this reply and I would suggest if you use any part of the answer you discuss it with one or both of your parents. I have had three daughters go through school, and I was able to tell them what I consider the truth and guide them into what answers the teachers were expecting. In your case, I am not sure of your level of training by parents, your personal understanding or exposure to the concepts this country is based on, nor how your teacher accepts things outside her line of thought. Most don't, my kids only had one teacher that did and he had thought on the way things should have been. Put simply, I am going to tell you what most people have never even thought of. The United States Constitution (USC) does not affect us in this country. It is not followed, and most folks do not have the first ideal of how to read or understand it-- the USC. People may pull bits and pieces out of the sentences and because the sentences make sense to them, use the concepts concerning personal freedoms. But their use of the USC is like folks telling storks bring babies--it just isn't true. I am now going to give you some information I used for several other questions. Parts of it will not apply, but maybe you can understand the basis from which to approach an understanding of this land's laws. --------------------------------------------I can’t answer your questions in a real fashion as you request, because the question is based on things that I know are wrong. Even the wording of this question, in a strict lawful sense could be misleading. A citizen (person) is a created position. Do you mean citizen or Sovereign and/or State (Sovereign with respect to his creation, the USC)? And with grievance against the hired help, do you mean civil or the government (hired help) has used force against one (an individual). As to the "Supreme Court", do you mean the inferior equity court created by the hired help and for reason of the lie, called the "united states supreme court"? It is not the supreme Court created by the Sovereigns via the USC.It was never meant to be a democracy. I will agree the law is not being followed. But the problem is not only the hired help, but also the People's understanding of the concept put forth. I have some questions for you. Would you hire me or someone else to work for you and be over you? Would you give me the right by that hiring contract to take money by force out of your pocket? Would you hire me to use hired guns against you? Or any force for that matter? Would you hire me to judge you? Would you hire me to change the contract you hired me to work for you by, without coming back to you to change the contract? Would you make a deal with others to do the above? Would you make a deal (compact) with others and then change it without getting them to agree by the procedure agreed to originally? I sure wouldn't, but then I don't know about you. The supreme law of this land is the Declaration of Independence, a compact between the Sovereigns and the USC is the subordinate compact to the Sovereigns (made by them) and contract to the hired help who agreed to follow the rules and especially the intent of the supreme law.It is your document and mine. You want me to tell you what it says? I will give you mostly what it means to me. I have read the united states code annotated, but do not think the us codes annotated (usca) say a whole lot about. But the hired help are not suppose to tell you, the master, what to do and what the rules for your own house say and mean.The Declaration of Independence (I hope you have read and though on it) is the supreme law of this land. It is listed in the usca as the organic law of land. Means it cannot be changed by hired help. The short form of the essence of the law is --We hold these truths to be self-evident (don't need explaining) that all men (individuals, and that includes women, children, blacks, gays, hispanics, etc) are created equal (with respect to this law), that they are endowed (given) by their Creator (allah, god, vishnu, the post on the corner) with certain unalienable (means a lien or burden cannot be laid on your shoulders, ie you can not be made to owe or be responsible for) Rights, that among these (not limited to just those listed)are Life, Liberty(no one over) and the pursuit of Happiness. Capital letters denote a proper subject and these items carry capitals in the body of the sentence. The very next sentence states that the only reason for forming a government is to secure these Rights. Means the whole purpose of USC was to make sure all the People were insured their unalienable Rights given them by Creator. You must also, read the complete document, but it goes on to list a very large number of things that were worth fighting about that the king of england was doing. Most are being done by hired help to the People they are suppose to serve today.Until we changed the practice of the world bodies, every nation was ruled by a king (sometime called something else) who ruled as a direct appointment of god. Since god could do no wrong, the king could or would not do wrong. So a disobedience of the king's law was a direct disobedience and affront to god.The first paragraph is to world, telling them why this thing is being done. The write up goes on to say, we had in the past accepted this rule of appointment by god nonesense, but it's just not so now. So since we had once accepted it, we are now telling the world many of the reasons why we are rejecting it and the doctrine. WE are Going With Creator and his Rule of equality. We are going to accept our full, equal, and rightful place as an equal with Creator. Some words you need to know, Congress--means a gathering--the People gathered at Bunker (Breeds actually) Hill, Valley Forge, York Town, Concord, and ratified (passed) this the only begotten Law of the People. Hope this helps.PS-- I have by self-appointment made myself Chief Justice of the USC's supreme Court. That is the only open supreme Court I am aware of. If you are aware of another besides the inferior equity court created by the hired congress and called for reasons of guile (the lie)"united states supreme court", I would love to know of it.
Yours for unalienable Rights from Creator.