Unalienable Rights from Creator versus USC ostrich slavers

Unalienable Rights from Creator versus USC ostrich slavers

Do any of you out there have a well mannered kid you wish to sell me for my use of my work needs, my pleasures, and possibly to resale for profit or pay bills (debt)? Shucks if you will let your hired congresspersons run up a bill. If you and most everyone wants to believe your kids have to take responsibility for the debt you and your hired servants bought your daily drugs with, then I will try to buy one or two of the chattel kid. Unless I get in real debt trouble and have to sell them or pledge the purchased chattel as collateral, someday I might decide to give them unalienable rights. And make them equal to me. See what a good deal you would be doing for yourself and you kids. You get money today for drugs, and they get hope for some future day.

This is the actual view the hired servant (congresspersons, presidents) has of you and your kids. Where else do they come up with the concept they are our king. By hiding there actual deeds under the inferior court system rulings. Congress created and selects the inferior administrative black robes and calls them judges. If the judges don’t do as congress wishes, then congress writes or rewrites a law and tell created judges this is the (our) rule.

Please remember, I will tell you what I believe and hold and where I come up with it. Not so the inferior court system and the money hungry congresspersons.

Martha Steward was attached and had her unalienable rights taken by the hired servants. It was wrong in that the attack and taking was not in the owners’ one supreme Court. I will guess and agree Martha walked in to the inferior administrative court forum on the advice of the lawyer. Why would a boss, go into an inferior court. Since the lawyer makes his living off the bogus inferior court system why would he explain: I and my fellow lawyers are just shearing you for our benefit and to keep others in line with fear? After the so-called trial, they do what is called an allocution or where jurisdiction is then finally decided. Guess what, as far as I know, that is the only place other that the front end challenge of Jurisdiction where the judge is required to answer your question and that probably includes jurisdiction. Maybe not even the jurisdiction question on the front end, as I have never seen them stop their process of attack for jurisdiction reason on the record or answer it. Of course the system procedure rules; allow, permit, encourage, your hired or appointed lawyer to ask or not ask for you and to accept or not accept, not tell you the first thing about selling you down the river. The lawyer may ask you to sign the “pre-sentence report”, but by then you have been in and out of the tattoo parlor. You and your tattoo are down the river in a very old and leaky inner-tube. For justice to live and ensure domestic tranquility; jurisdiction has to be the very first item determined and be part of the record before an action begins.

This allocution is where they do the “pre-sentence report” and it is written in such style if signed, then you are admitting to guilt and your prescribed written in the code books punishment is as the presentence report gives. All that is generally left for appeal is procedural error or an incompetent lawyer. System really don’t like their rottenness brought up. Now Martha is down to doing time, then to get out on house arrest, the “parole papers” one has to sign to get a longer tow cable. On those papers, one has to admit they did the “crime” and agree that they do not claim any rights that the DOJ doesn’t want them to. In order to get the longer tow rope, skip the 3 hots and a cot in a 4 by 8 cell the paroles have to agree in writing on parole paper. If you want to call this type procedural behavior of the DOJ freewill consent of the paroles, good for you, I do not call it freewill consent. I have scant hope for Martha’s appeal because of all the above reasons. Yet there are quite a few who prevail after spending time even complete sentence (years or months) in jail, and after having paid the system lawyers a bundle to defend your rights. Means, after years of attacking and taking from you, they ruled in a higher court that the attack was wrong.

I realize all you ostriches have your head buried in the rabbit hole with Alice, but I also know that many of you have your exposed gut feeling something is not correct in this land of the unalienable Rights from the Creator and the subordinate USC.

Wesley Snipes is at this time going down almost the same road as Martha. Sherry Peel Jackson, Ed and Elaine Brown of NH are on very similar paths as concerns USC contract conditions. I wish them all luck and that their dream of law and justice and unalienable Rights are very shortly accorded to them in full measure as the law of this land intends.

Eddie Ray Kahn was tried with Snipes, but did not volunteer to walk into an inferior, clandestine inferior court. They have had Eddie in jail for over a year, and will not answer the jurisdiction issue he raised. Instead on the record, they put that he plead not guilty. Not only are they attacking Eddie and thereby his wife in direct violation of the DoI and subordinate USC contract terms and conditions, but they are also only creating a false record for the higher inferior court to see on review. The KKK did better than DOJ; they never lied about why they hung the victim. I guess uppity freedom lovers are fair game, as were uppity blacks.

Drop back for coming articles, articles will cover in more details several of the names above. My land’s wall of shamefully treated individual has more names than I like to see. One is one to many. If you disagree with that number please let me know how many it take to be shameful. 10, 20, 1000, 5000, 1,000,000 I hope when it reaches your number, you will do something, even if it is only to take your head out of the rabbit hole.

Yours for unalienable Rights from Creator ---- today and all tomorrows

unalienable rights, accepted USC, salt pillars&other fairy tale lies

Unalienable rights, accepted USC, salt pillars, & other fairy tale lies

I am trying to keep these articles short enough so those interested will check back for the next serial. The articles will not be 30 second sound bites, but will be done as a connected series style. Future articles are considered which will cover the very unlawful attacks on Ed Brown and his wife Elaine of NH, Martha Steward, Eddie Kahn and Wesley Snipes and the third member of that attacked group.

Back to this article. First let me paraphrase two stories from an old well known book in the present day language use. A man and his family were told to leave a wicked system, and not turn back (look back). Which the woman (staff) did and was turned to a pillar of salt. Salt represents a preservative. This story is reinforced a number of time with instructions not to consult with the dead. The second story tells the created to not eat (take) of the fruit of a tree of the land (garden). In the book, this was the instructions given by the Creators/Makers. The Creator’s reason for the rules was not necessary to be given. The Creator sets the rules as the Creator sees fit. If you have a Divinity who does not give you free will, then my adopted contact rules should give you all the freedom you wish.

Since I view the DoI and subordinate USC as contracts, let look at those documents as contracts for understanding interpretation and construction. All contracts are civil in nature and require a free will meeting of the minds by both the writing party and the created or accepting party. How you would do it I can only guess, but I would never take part of/in or write a contract to hire someone to be over me. Since I used the contract form to best protect my unalienable rights, I would never set the hired servants as the only police power “one supreme Court”. Only the bosses can set on that court and judge the hired servants per the contract terms. I realize that many of the hired servants, inferior administrative court black robes, politicians, newspapers, claim we are based on England’s law. That lie comes from scum who does not like unalienable rights or some dummies who know no better. The law of England was based on one king over all. That system is in no way close to or a fore-runner of our contract system. The two are not in any way comparable. By trying to preserve the king system, many wrongs have been done under my government’s name.

I have never hired a president or congress to run a king system and to do so pretending that is what the/my contract says.

There are many dummies out here who say to not have anything to do with my USC contract. There are also dummies saying they are Sovereigns. One, if following the USC contact as I understand the contract, I see no problem for me or any other believing-in-justice individual following those contact rules. Let me make it clear to any readers, I only accept what I consider a valid USC contract, not the servant add on. Only the makers can change their created contract. Once created, the makers can only change the contract as agreed to in the making. I know many of the People have their heart in the right place, but their logic and law language is not what I consider correct. One can only use or deal via the USC as a person, not a Sovereign. As a contract person, the makers can in any issue matter against the created, have and maintain a higher status. Last input this article, whether an owner or a created person, all who deal/use per the USC have to know the USC can only be used as an Adhesion Contract. Until the next article, may your mind be active on this land’s law.