Unalienable Rights from Creator versus USC ostrich slavers
Do any of you out there have a well mannered kid you wish to sell me for my use of my work needs, my pleasures, and possibly to resale for profit or pay bills (debt)? Shucks if you will let your hired congresspersons run up a bill. If you and most everyone wants to believe your kids have to take responsibility for the debt you and your hired servants bought your daily drugs with, then I will try to buy one or two of the chattel kid. Unless I get in real debt trouble and have to sell them or pledge the purchased chattel as collateral, someday I might decide to give them unalienable rights. And make them equal to me. See what a good deal you would be doing for yourself and you kids. You get money today for drugs, and they get hope for some future day.
This is the actual view the hired servant (congresspersons, presidents) has of you and your kids. Where else do they come up with the concept they are our king. By hiding there actual deeds under the inferior court system rulings. Congress created and selects the inferior administrative black robes and calls them judges. If the judges don’t do as congress wishes, then congress writes or rewrites a law and tell created judges this is the (our) rule.
Please remember, I will tell you what I believe and hold and where I come up with it. Not so the inferior court system and the money hungry congresspersons.
Martha Steward was attached and had her unalienable rights taken by the hired servants. It was wrong in that the attack and taking was not in the owners’ one supreme Court. I will guess and agree Martha walked in to the inferior administrative court forum on the advice of the lawyer. Why would a boss, go into an inferior court. Since the lawyer makes his living off the bogus inferior court system why would he explain: I and my fellow lawyers are just shearing you for our benefit and to keep others in line with fear? After the so-called trial, they do what is called an allocution or where jurisdiction is then finally decided. Guess what, as far as I know, that is the only place other that the front end challenge of Jurisdiction where the judge is required to answer your question and that probably includes jurisdiction. Maybe not even the jurisdiction question on the front end, as I have never seen them stop their process of attack for jurisdiction reason on the record or answer it. Of course the system procedure rules; allow, permit, encourage, your hired or appointed lawyer to ask or not ask for you and to accept or not accept, not tell you the first thing about selling you down the river. The lawyer may ask you to sign the “pre-sentence report”, but by then you have been in and out of the tattoo parlor. You and your tattoo are down the river in a very old and leaky inner-tube. For justice to live and ensure domestic tranquility; jurisdiction has to be the very first item determined and be part of the record before an action begins.
This allocution is where they do the “pre-sentence report” and it is written in such style if signed, then you are admitting to guilt and your prescribed written in the code books punishment is as the presentence report gives. All that is generally left for appeal is procedural error or an incompetent lawyer. System really don’t like their rottenness brought up. Now Martha is down to doing time, then to get out on house arrest, the “parole papers” one has to sign to get a longer tow cable. On those papers, one has to admit they did the “crime” and agree that they do not claim any rights that the DOJ doesn’t want them to. In order to get the longer tow rope, skip the 3 hots and a cot in a 4 by 8 cell the paroles have to agree in writing on parole paper. If you want to call this type procedural behavior of the DOJ freewill consent of the paroles, good for you, I do not call it freewill consent. I have scant hope for Martha’s appeal because of all the above reasons. Yet there are quite a few who prevail after spending time even complete sentence (years or months) in jail, and after having paid the system lawyers a bundle to defend your rights. Means, after years of attacking and taking from you, they ruled in a higher court that the attack was wrong.
I realize all you ostriches have your head buried in the rabbit hole with Alice, but I also know that many of you have your exposed gut feeling something is not correct in this land of the unalienable Rights from the Creator and the subordinate USC.
Wesley Snipes is at this time going down almost the same road as Martha. Sherry Peel Jackson, Ed and Elaine Brown of NH are on very similar paths as concerns USC contract conditions. I wish them all luck and that their dream of law and justice and unalienable Rights are very shortly accorded to them in full measure as the law of this land intends.
Eddie Ray Kahn was tried with Snipes, but did not volunteer to walk into an inferior, clandestine inferior court. They have had Eddie in jail for over a year, and will not answer the jurisdiction issue he raised. Instead on the record, they put that he plead not guilty. Not only are they attacking Eddie and thereby his wife in direct violation of the DoI and subordinate USC contract terms and conditions, but they are also only creating a false record for the higher inferior court to see on review. The KKK did better than DOJ; they never lied about why they hung the victim. I guess uppity freedom lovers are fair game, as were uppity blacks.
Drop back for coming articles, articles will cover in more details several of the names above. My land’s wall of shamefully treated individual has more names than I like to see. One is one to many. If you disagree with that number please let me know how many it take to be shameful. 10, 20, 1000, 5000, 1,000,000 I hope when it reaches your number, you will do something, even if it is only to take your head out of the rabbit hole.
Yours for unalienable Rights from Creator ---- today and all tomorrows
Do any of you out there have a well mannered kid you wish to sell me for my use of my work needs, my pleasures, and possibly to resale for profit or pay bills (debt)? Shucks if you will let your hired congresspersons run up a bill. If you and most everyone wants to believe your kids have to take responsibility for the debt you and your hired servants bought your daily drugs with, then I will try to buy one or two of the chattel kid. Unless I get in real debt trouble and have to sell them or pledge the purchased chattel as collateral, someday I might decide to give them unalienable rights. And make them equal to me. See what a good deal you would be doing for yourself and you kids. You get money today for drugs, and they get hope for some future day.
This is the actual view the hired servant (congresspersons, presidents) has of you and your kids. Where else do they come up with the concept they are our king. By hiding there actual deeds under the inferior court system rulings. Congress created and selects the inferior administrative black robes and calls them judges. If the judges don’t do as congress wishes, then congress writes or rewrites a law and tell created judges this is the (our) rule.
Please remember, I will tell you what I believe and hold and where I come up with it. Not so the inferior court system and the money hungry congresspersons.
Martha Steward was attached and had her unalienable rights taken by the hired servants. It was wrong in that the attack and taking was not in the owners’ one supreme Court. I will guess and agree Martha walked in to the inferior administrative court forum on the advice of the lawyer. Why would a boss, go into an inferior court. Since the lawyer makes his living off the bogus inferior court system why would he explain: I and my fellow lawyers are just shearing you for our benefit and to keep others in line with fear? After the so-called trial, they do what is called an allocution or where jurisdiction is then finally decided. Guess what, as far as I know, that is the only place other that the front end challenge of Jurisdiction where the judge is required to answer your question and that probably includes jurisdiction. Maybe not even the jurisdiction question on the front end, as I have never seen them stop their process of attack for jurisdiction reason on the record or answer it. Of course the system procedure rules; allow, permit, encourage, your hired or appointed lawyer to ask or not ask for you and to accept or not accept, not tell you the first thing about selling you down the river. The lawyer may ask you to sign the “pre-sentence report”, but by then you have been in and out of the tattoo parlor. You and your tattoo are down the river in a very old and leaky inner-tube. For justice to live and ensure domestic tranquility; jurisdiction has to be the very first item determined and be part of the record before an action begins.
This allocution is where they do the “pre-sentence report” and it is written in such style if signed, then you are admitting to guilt and your prescribed written in the code books punishment is as the presentence report gives. All that is generally left for appeal is procedural error or an incompetent lawyer. System really don’t like their rottenness brought up. Now Martha is down to doing time, then to get out on house arrest, the “parole papers” one has to sign to get a longer tow cable. On those papers, one has to admit they did the “crime” and agree that they do not claim any rights that the DOJ doesn’t want them to. In order to get the longer tow rope, skip the 3 hots and a cot in a 4 by 8 cell the paroles have to agree in writing on parole paper. If you want to call this type procedural behavior of the DOJ freewill consent of the paroles, good for you, I do not call it freewill consent. I have scant hope for Martha’s appeal because of all the above reasons. Yet there are quite a few who prevail after spending time even complete sentence (years or months) in jail, and after having paid the system lawyers a bundle to defend your rights. Means, after years of attacking and taking from you, they ruled in a higher court that the attack was wrong.
I realize all you ostriches have your head buried in the rabbit hole with Alice, but I also know that many of you have your exposed gut feeling something is not correct in this land of the unalienable Rights from the Creator and the subordinate USC.
Wesley Snipes is at this time going down almost the same road as Martha. Sherry Peel Jackson, Ed and Elaine Brown of NH are on very similar paths as concerns USC contract conditions. I wish them all luck and that their dream of law and justice and unalienable Rights are very shortly accorded to them in full measure as the law of this land intends.
Eddie Ray Kahn was tried with Snipes, but did not volunteer to walk into an inferior, clandestine inferior court. They have had Eddie in jail for over a year, and will not answer the jurisdiction issue he raised. Instead on the record, they put that he plead not guilty. Not only are they attacking Eddie and thereby his wife in direct violation of the DoI and subordinate USC contract terms and conditions, but they are also only creating a false record for the higher inferior court to see on review. The KKK did better than DOJ; they never lied about why they hung the victim. I guess uppity freedom lovers are fair game, as were uppity blacks.
Drop back for coming articles, articles will cover in more details several of the names above. My land’s wall of shamefully treated individual has more names than I like to see. One is one to many. If you disagree with that number please let me know how many it take to be shameful. 10, 20, 1000, 5000, 1,000,000 I hope when it reaches your number, you will do something, even if it is only to take your head out of the rabbit hole.
Yours for unalienable Rights from Creator ---- today and all tomorrows
No comments:
Post a Comment